Matt Ouellette

Matt Ouellette is a certified information technology professional residing in Southwest Michigan. His technology findings and advice can be found on his PacketPilot blog. Mr. Ouellette spent 4 years as an I.T. Technician before stepping into a Network Engineer role at Bronson Health Group. Since completing his Associates Degree in Network Administration Matt has taken a head on approach to career enrichment through obtaining credentials such as CCNP, CCNA Voice, MCSA: Server 2008, and VCP5. This passion for continued learning allows him to deliver up to date quality technical solutions.

Most commented posts

  1. Cisco Live US 2019 – Explorer Guide — 2 comments
  2. Cisco SD-WAN ISR 4k Getting Started – Part 2 – Bootstrap Process — 1 comment

Author's posts

Bulk enable PIM via TCL

Reading Time: 3 minutes

I’ve been working on doing some multicast labs lately and am constantly resetting my lab devices to their default configs and starting from scratch. As many of us know, to enable PIM on all of your interfaces you must go into each interface and enable it manually. There is no default command to enable PIM on all interfaces. We know PIM should be enabled 1 to 1 with interfaces involved in routing making this a boon. With that in mind, and the fact that I am rather comfortable with the concept of needing PIM on the interfaces, and likely speak and type this command in my sleep, I decided to make it easier and modify a previous TCL script I had written to enable PIM on every interface that has an IP address assigned to it. With the great “Send to Chat” feature of SecureCRT I can do this across my entire topology on one fell swoop. In a real world environment, you could use a tool like Solarwinds to push this out to your devices.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/bulk-enable-pim-via-tcl/

Daily Learning Actions

Reading Time: 5 minutes

The other night while studying I tweeted out the first six words that came to mind as I thought to myself “How can I retain this better”. The concept is really quite simple and I find myself doing these steps for everything I am trying to learn and retain. While everyone learns *best* a certain way, everyone also learns more by being around the material more. I don’t feel I need to explain how to find what way of learning works best for you. Nor am I going to pretend to have a clue how people learn or retain better in any sort of scientific way. I’m simply going to explain my view on my six word study method.

The Method:

Read, watch, listen, learn, discuss, do!

It’s a simple mantra that you can think about every time you start studying a topic. In fact, you already learn all of these ways throughout the day. The concept here is to apply all six of them to every topic you are focused on studying.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/daily-learning-actions/

Apps for a Network Engineer Part II: Windows

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Windows for Network Engineers

Part two in my series of apps for network engineers across the three major platforms. I previously did the post for Mac when I first refreshed my laptop and purchased my first new Mac in 8 years. Issued by work, my daily laptop is a Windows machine which is fine with me. I would prefer to use Mac but give me a machine that has the tools I need and I’m fine. So with that in mind, I am going to list my favorite Windows tools for Network Engineers.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/apps-for-a-network-engineer-part-ii-windows/

What is that timestamp? – Dial-Peers – Last Setup/Disconnect Time

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Being the geek I am, I was troubleshooting an issue one day where I wanted to see what dial-peer a certain digit string was hitting on a gateway. I saw something that simply intrigued my mind that took focus away until I figured it out. This “thing” I saw was irrelevant to what I was troubleshooting but once the problem was resolved I simply had to figure it out. I’m sure many of you experience that same thing throughout your days. So, this is what I’ve discovered. *Please note that this is not an official explanation of the item/output, it is simply my interpretation from time spent figuring out what it really meant.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/what-is-that-timestamp-dial-peers-last-setupdisconnect-time/

Linux to Cisco Openswan IPSec Configuration

Reading Time: 6 minutes

[notice]For this example I use the following IP scheme    192.168.0.12|–O–42.42.42.42—–[INTERNET]——12.12.12.12–O–|10.42.42.42[/notice]

I was approached a few weeks back to assist in creating a VPN Tunnel between two end points. Of course in my naivety I readily assumed it was between to Cisco devices but that turned out not to be the case. The tunnel was to be between a Linux box (in this case Ubuntu on a hosted VPS provider) and an unknown endpoint. This tunnel was going to be host to host as opposed to LAN to LAN. After some quick discovery work, getting access to the Linux box, and seeing the required proposal from the other side I started diving into the unknown of Openswan. Luckily, after doing som research for the configuration and verification things started shaping up and much to my approval, a lot of what you would look for in Cisco verification was the same on the Linux box. The configuration goes as such.

Naturally the first step is to install Openswan. As per usual use your distributions software management to install this. The first thing I configured was the ipsec configuration file. On the Ubuntu box this resided in “/etc/ipsec.conf”. The configuration was as follows.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/linux-to-cisco-openswan-ipsec-configuration/

Route-Targets Explained

Reading Time: 3 minutes

 

As I began to study MPLS L3VPNs I was excited to start flinging my fingers around the keyboard. However, I ran into a little snafu during my learning. All of the videos and configuration example I was finding didn’t separate the difference between the Route Distinguisher (RD) and the Route Targets. Most of the examples simply matched the RD to the Route Targets and/or used the same Route Targets for both import and export. This left me feeling like I wasn’t really understanding what those commands and numbers were accomplishing. I decided to make a visual representation to make it easier to understand.

Router-Target Policy Visualization

Router-Target Policy Visualization

To make this concept easier to understand we first need to know that the RD does not dictate what routes a route will import or export into it’s PE-CE routing process. The purpose of the RD so to add an additional label to prefixes so overlaps can be inserted in the BGP table and shared amongst the various PE routers. For example, my RD of 65000:8 indicates any routers in the BGP table from my customer vrf would indicate a prefix of 10.20.30.40 as 65000:8:10.20.30.40. This means if another vrf with a different RD of 4242:42 could also install 10.20.30.40 in the providers BGP table as 4242:42:10.20.30.40.

Now that we are clear on the use of the RD we can move onto the Route Targets. There are two route targets we define in our VRF policy. The import and export targets. Many examples and videos show these as the same (which is a perfectly valid configuration) often times matching the RD. To clarify exactly what they are used for I have used three different Router Targets. I am going to correlate their indicators with colors to make the example easier to visualize.

Routes exported from the headquarters use 30:8 which we will call the “Blue Routes”
Routes exported from Branch 1 will use 10:8 which we will call the “Red Router”
Routes exported from Branch 2 will use 20:8 which we will call the “Green Routes”

This exporting is done by the PE routers connecting to the CE routers. The CE routers in this example our peering via eBGP with the PE routers inside of a VRF. The VRF configuration on the PE routers is what indicates the Router Target identifier to export. At this point we can write a policy of which routers should be allowed into the individual CE routes using the VRF Route Target import. Lets follow a case from the HQ to Branch 1.

HQ CE peers with its PE router which has a VRF policy stating to export its routes as the color Blue. These routes are passed around to the other PE routers. When the Branch 1 PE peer receives the routes it sees that it’s VRF policy is stating to export its routes as the color Red as well as import any routes that are colored Blue. Back at the headquarters we have our VRF policy set to import both the Red and Green routes. Branch 2 does the same as Branch 1 but swapping out Red for Green.

By writing the VRF policies this way we have created a Branch to HQ connection while not passing routes Branch to Branch. In my diagram I show the routes coming into the CE routes as it is the ultimate end goal however, please keep in mind that the VRF configuration is done on the PE routes.

I hope that by using simple colors for the routes it has simplified the reasons we use the RD, and the import and export Route Target. I found it difficult to understand the true use of these configuration when they were using the same value for the RD as well as the import and export Route Targets.

 

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/route-targets-explained/

Infocus Mondopad Registered with CUCM – SIP

Reading Time: 2 minutes

This post is primarily for archived documentation for myself in the event of possible future need. However, I was having a hard time finding any configuration examples for this task. The steps below are those I used to connect a 70inch Infocus Mondopad to our CUCM environment to be able to make video calls including sharing the Mondopads screen over the called Cisco phone.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/infocus-mondopad-registered-with-cucm-sip/

Synapps Paging Delays – An HTTP/TCP Wireshark diagnosis

Reading Time: 5 minutes

The Scenario goes like this: A Synapps – SA Announce paging and messaging server integrated with Cisco’s CUCM hosting around 30 phone to phone paging groups. The paging had been working fine for months and out of no where one of thirty particular groups was putting in multiple trouble tickets over multiple days that the paging isn’t working.

So begins the troubleshooting and diagnosis. My first action was to monitor the paging server as it has a real time display of who is calling a paging group and which group they are calling at in given time. When I was monitoring this I could see multiple people calling multiple groups including the one in question. So this brings up one of those “what gives” questions. Are they just doing something wrong up in the area. Time to take a trip and raise that pedometer count.

I arrive in the area and try and locate and area where I can visually see and hear multiple phones. Easier said than done but in this case I was the only one available to work on the issue and knowing that the paging server will activate the speakerphone and mute lights when a group the phone is a member of is called this was my best bet and understanding what was going on. After making my first test page I can see that lights on the phones I can see are immediately lighting up, however I can’t hear audio. As I stand there dumbfounded with the phone still off hook all of a sudden the audio starts picking up the background noise. However, paging shouldn’t have a 6 second delay before you can start talking. Six seconds is a long time to wait after hitting page to start talking. So whats going on? It’s only one group experiencing this. What is different about their group? Time for a deep dive in the diagnostics world. Enter Wireshark.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/it-was-broke-but-the-sharks-got-to-it/

Trouble shoot with TDR

Reading Time: 5 minutes

This article is another example of trouble shooting by putting multiple pieces together. While it relies upon existing knowledge of the environment in which the article is based it should prove to be a good example of a trouble shooting process that will hopefully be able to spark some creative thinking the next time you have a problem that needs to be resolved.

The scenario starts out with a user ticket stating that the phone isn’t working. After some fact gathering the below details and possible solutions were outlined.
Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/trouble-shoot-with-tdr/

IP SLA for Single Default Route Change

Reading Time: 5 minutes

The scenario goes like this. You are working at your office (R1) and need to change the IP address and default route on the remote device (R2). The issue a factor of two things. The first is the fact that R2 is connected to your network with only one link. The other issue is R2 cannot use any dynamic routing protocols so you are stuck with a default route that is pointing at the next hop. If you are to change either of these facts you lose connectivity to R2. While there are other solutions to making this change, I am going to take the concept of floating static routes and an IP SLA to change both the IP address and the default route.

Continue reading

Share this article:

Permanent link to this article: https://www.packetpilot.com/ip-sla-for-single-default-route-change/

Load more